A female bounty hunter who hallucinates slices of the future saves a man?s life in order to collect the bounty on his violent time-travelling future self.

FFF has a point that high-stake bounties are usually dead or alive. ?All one has to do is produce a body.

But if should she have competition, a ?bad-ass male rival, who is determined to just kill him off, deliver a body? ?Somebody else wants to collect on the (future) bounty? ?Then she has a motivation to "save" him for her own benefit in the future. ?That's her preferred m.o. in contrast to the bad-ass, deliver them alive.

Anyway, I like the concept. ?What I like about this logline is that the questions it?raises about problems?(and I have a few) are far exceeded by the questions it raises about possibilities.

Best wishes for this story.

Hello, I think I don't get it right...
usually (not necessarely) you collect a bounty when you kill someone or when you capture someone, not when you save someone...

Is your idea that a criminal in the future pays the girl who sees the future to protect?him in the past?

About, the main character, can't you say she's a clairvoyant? A clairvoyant doesn't see the whole future but only some 'slices' and it's often confused and ambiguous, I think it fits the charcter.

One more thing,"save" is vague and not effective since we don't know from what the man is saved.

Thanks, StellaAurora. I'm trying to keep it short and intriguing while hinting that it's a mind-bending action flick.

?