After stealing millions from a ruthless Las Vegas casino empire, two estranged biracial twin brothers flee back to New York hoping to rebuild their lives, only to discover their parents are dead, their childhood home is gone, and the violent syndicate they betrayed is hunting them through a city that no longer has a place for them.
Daniel 1Penpusher
After stealing millions from a ruthless Las Vegas casino empire, two estranged biracial twin brothers flee back to New York hoping to rebuild their lives, only to discover their parents are dead, their childhood home is gone, and the violent syndicate they betrayed is hunting them through a city that no longer has a place for them.
Share
This is a situation; not a story. You have the first sequence of an 8-sequence feature.
How will they cope with the situation? What is/are the goal/s that will drive this film?
And how do the twins differ in character? Otherwise there would be no reason for a dual-protagonist film.
The setup is strong, with classic heist-and-flight bones and a clear setback structure: the brothers steal, they flee, they discover loss waiting for them.
The two-protagonist choice may work dramatically if the estrangement gives them an internal arc to play against the external hunt.
Where the logline gets uncertain: we know what’s happened to them, but not what they DO about it. “Hoping to rebuild their lives” is internal, and after the triple discovery the brothers become targets rather than agents.
“A city that no longer has a place for them” is the kind of theme line that sounds good but tells us little and “biracial” is doing work only if the brothers’ mixed heritage is central to the syndicate’s hunt or to the New York they’re returning to; if it’s flavour, replace it with a word that names a psychology.
This is a situation; not a story. You have the first sequence of an 8-sequence feature.
How will they cope with the situation? What is the goal that will drive this film?
And how do the twins differ in character? Otherwise there would be no reason for a dual-protagonist film.
The setup is strong, with classic heist-and-flight bones and a clear setback structure: the brothers steal, they flee, they discover loss waiting for them.
The two-protagonist choice may work dramatically if the estrangement gives them an internal arc to play against the external hunt.
Where the logline gets uncertain: we know what’s happened to them, but not what they DO about it. “Hoping to rebuild their lives” is internal, and after the triple discovery the brothers become targets rather than agents.
“A city that no longer has a place for them” is the kind of theme line that sounds good but tells us little and “biracial” is doing work only if the brothers’ mixed heritage is central to the syndicate’s hunt or to the New York they’re returning to; if it’s flavour, replace it with a word that names a psychology.