Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
After he smack-cams a deranged vagabond, a prankish vlogger must fight to survive when the stranger invades his home sporting a bloody billhook.
You need a different lead character.The lead character should be a friend who had nothing to do with the "Prank"However the lead, the prankster and a bunch of teens are in the house (A party maybe) an the killer guts them one by one whether guilty or innocent.Now it's up to the lead character to stoRead more
You need a different lead character.
The lead character should be a friend who had nothing to do with the “Prank”
However the lead, the prankster and a bunch of teens are in the house (A party maybe) an the killer guts them one by one whether guilty or innocent.
Now it’s up to the lead character to stop the deranged homeless man.
Hope that helped, good luck with this
See lessWhen her shark-diving cage breaks off and sinks to the seabed, a first-time diver must resurface amidst a looming great white before her oxygen tank runs out. [In The Deep, 2016]
The IMDB entry describes the film as two sisters trapped in the cage . ?So here is my take with co-protagonists: When their shark observation cage breaks off and sinks to the bottom, two sisters, first time divers, must?resurface amidst looming great whites before they run out of oxygen. (29 words)
The IMDB entry describes the film as two sisters trapped in the cage . ?So here is my take with co-protagonists:
When their shark observation cage breaks off and sinks to the bottom, two sisters, first time divers, must?resurface amidst looming great whites before they run out of oxygen.
See less(29 words)
A cyber security analyst must steal the government’s undercover handler list when a hacker threatens to remotely crash his wife’s plane.
I can't square the circle on all the variations ?and tweaks that have been done on the premise.Except to say that since 9/11, the mind set of the U.S. security agencies (and most others) is that it is no use giving into the demands of terrorists because they are so ?fanatical ?they will carry out thRead more
I can’t square the circle on all the variations ?and tweaks that have been done on the premise.
Except to say that since 9/11, the mind set of the U.S. security agencies (and most others) is that it is no use giving into the demands of terrorists because they are so ?fanatical ?they will carry out their lethal threats even if governments comply with their demands.
?Which in this situation is exactly what the villain can do without having to put any blood or skin into the game because he’s can crash the plane remotely, right? ?If the villain gets the information he wants, what’s the downside for him for going through with the threat anyway? ? ?It’ would seem to be a win-win proposition for him. ?And a win-win- win if he also kills the hacker. ?If the villain’s reach is so great that he can destroy a plane remotely, why can’t he also kill the analyst after he gets what he wants from him?
Ergo, it’s reasonable for the protagonist to conclude that his wife is doomed if he doesn’t comply — and she’s doomed if he does. ?So, it seems to me, the dramatic question is ?not whether he can steal the data, but can he foil the villain from carrying out his threat.
And why ?would the villain want the handlers? ?Wouldn’t he really want to have the list of who the handlers handle — their contacts, their informants?
See less