Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
An inner-city terrorist attack traps a disgraced former politician and an anarchist student protestor in an elevator on the 67th floor of a burning building with little hope of help. When suspicion of each other’s involvement in the incident arises, they are forced to re-examine their assumptions about each other and cooperate if they want to survive.
The film sounds like a buddy movie with two buddies who hate each other, but have to work together. Something like Hell in the Pacific, but in a burning building. Or perhaps a crossover between Hell in the Pacific and Die Hard (terrorists in a building). However, what is the main action that they arRead more
The film sounds like a buddy movie with two buddies who hate each other, but have to work together. Something like Hell in the Pacific, but in a burning building. Or perhaps a crossover between Hell in the Pacific and Die Hard (terrorists in a building).
However, what is the main action that they are expected to perform?
I would expect that step (1) would require some minor actions and (2) would have unexpected complications; perhaps terrorists are still in the building?
But there should be something more specific than “work together.” “Work together” could be something as simple as one pushing the other up through the hatch above their heads -and then the film ends.
Note: You know that it’s way to long for a logline, don’t you? -58 words or so. (Bravo, Richiev, for doing a great job chopping it down!)
See lessWhen a single mother investigates her son?s claim that he was murdered in his past life, she inadvertently implicates her self in the unsolved crime and becomes the number one suspect. To prove her innocence, they go on the run, determined to find the real killer before a hard as nails detective can bring them in.
Why MUST she do anything? Kids say stuff all the time, most of which makes little to no sense. Why does she suddenly decide to take his claims seriously? Why MUST she act?
Why MUST she do anything? Kids say stuff all the time, most of which makes little to no sense. Why does she suddenly decide to take his claims seriously? Why MUST she act?
See lessA rookie female detective, out to prove herself, is tasked with protecting a single mother and her son when a serial killer learns that the young boy claims to be the re-incarnation of one of his victims, and tries to kill him again.
I agree with all previous comments. My biggest question though is why does the killer care? Unless this boy can remember incriminating facts about the killer then surely, knowing this is a sure fire way to get caught, he'd just steer clear. What is it about the reincarnated person that the killer deRead more
I agree with all previous comments.
My biggest question though is why does the killer care? Unless this boy can remember incriminating facts about the killer then surely, knowing this is a sure fire way to get caught, he’d just steer clear. What is it about the reincarnated person that the killer deems so important that he must risk his life to kill him again. Just as the protagonist must have a clear visual goal, the antagonist’s goal must also be clear. How does the killer even learn about this? If the mother found out that her son was a serial killer’s victim reincarnated wouldn’t she just keep quiet? This setup also means that this serial killer has been wanted for at least say 4/5 years minimum? The boy has to be old enough to be able to express that he’s reincarnated. What’s the killer been doing all this time?
I feel there’s a ?lot of implausibility that, whilst it initially sounds cool, actually ends up asking too much of the audience. The reincarnation bit is the hook – the audience must buy into this so strengthen how that element works. The boy can’t just claim that he is… there has to be undeniable proof!
Hope this helps.
See less