Sign Up Sign Up

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In Sign In

Forgot Password?

If you'd like access, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

To see everything, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Logline It! Logo Logline It! Logo
Sign InSign Up

Logline It!

Logline It! Navigation

  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
  • Buy Feedback
  • Blog
Search
Post Your Logline

Mobile menu

Close
Post Your Logline
  • Signup
  • The Logline Generator
  • Search Loglines
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • Logline Generator
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Search Loglines
  • Buy Feedback
  • Blog
  • Recent Loglines
  • Most Answered
  • Reviews
  • Feedback Wanted
  • Most Visited
  • Most Voted
  • Random
  1. Posted: April 25, 2019In: Thriller

    In 1961, a British double agent, living under a new alias, must thwart a corrupt former colleague who threatens to expose his existence to a secret organisation of Nazis, unless he takes part in his complex game of human chess.

    thedarkhorse Samurai
    Added an answer on May 6, 2019 at 1:35 am

    Forced and pawn are not proactive. His plan within the situation should be stated? (In the next log - I?ll put down he?s planning to play them off against each other. For something that is twisty-turny (this is my homage to Hitchcock?s Vertigo, Notorious, etc) - it is hard to know how much to give aRead more

    Forced and pawn are not proactive. His plan within the situation should be stated?

    (In the next log – I?ll put down he?s planning to play them off against each other. For something that is twisty-turny (this is my homage to Hitchcock?s Vertigo, Notorious, etc) – it is hard to know how much to give away.?

    Why the elaborate blackmail plan?

    The corrupt government agent/former colleague is also up to no good.

    How long can the blackmail last?

    The blackmail is a catalyst. Once the protagonist is entangled in this mess of double agendas and hidden schemes, it should become increasingly hard to get out of it.

    Okay. I?ll post in a few days – with new loglines. Cheers.

    Also (and for all four) shall I post in this thread or start a new one?

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  2. Posted: April 28, 2019In: Thriller

    When two donors to a rising fascist leader commit suicide, a conspiracy theorist FBI agent must investigate if there is a connection; but when he discovers an elaborate CIA plot to stop the fascist, he must put his country before the law, and protect future targets by killing their leader.

    Ckharper Samurai
    Added an answer on April 29, 2019 at 3:06 pm

    Is this in the US so FBI jurisdiction? Or foreign soil so CIA territory? I know sometimes FBI agents are sent abroad to investigate missing person cases (when a country requests help), complex bank fraud (like in Switzerland, Panama), but why here? That?s my first question.

    Is this in the US so FBI jurisdiction? Or foreign soil so CIA territory? I know sometimes FBI agents are sent abroad to investigate missing person cases (when a country requests help), complex bank fraud (like in Switzerland, Panama), but why here? That?s my first question.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  3. Posted: April 24, 2019In: Thriller

    Logline

    henb Samurai
    Added an answer on April 29, 2019 at 7:41 am

    The lawyer doesn't unwittingly prove the guilty man innocent, she simply doesn't know he is a bad person. 'Now she'll stop at nothing', sounds too vague. Please give some examples of how she will accomplish this. What skills and resources does she have at her disposal? Does she kill someone herselfRead more

    The lawyer doesn’t unwittingly prove the guilty man innocent, she simply doesn’t know he is a bad person. ‘Now she’ll stop at nothing’, sounds too vague. Please give some examples of how she will accomplish this. What skills and resources does she have at her disposal? Does she kill someone herself to frame him? Where does she find the dead body to accuse him with? Why does she strive to frame this man? Is he abusive towards her?

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp

Sidebar

Stats

  • Loglines 8,027
  • Reviews 32,212
  • Best Reviews 629
  • Users 3,806

Try the Logline Generator

aalan

Explore

  • Signup
  • The Logline Generator
  • Search Loglines
  • Learn our simple Logline Formula
  • Blog

Footer

© 2012–2026 Karel Segers. All Rights Reserved
With Love from Immersion Screenwriting.